Magic SmokeBB-0107

StationX: an AI agent designs a KiCad 10 badge and DRC catches its beginner mistakes

Nathan House had an AI assistant with KiCad 10 design a coin-cell LED blinker badge. It picked an NE555 that needs 4.5 V, put a via 0.0285 mm from a pad, broke courtyard rules and reported a 150.4% duty cycle. The article says datasheet checks, DRC and an analytic check caught each one before any board was ordered.

Open original source app.stationx.net · Nathan House

Claimed
Why this evidence label?

Article shows ERC/DRC results, simulation output and renders; no fabricated board yet.

How we check entries
Preview image for StationX: an AI agent designs a KiCad 10 badge and DRC catches its beginner mistakes
The source's own preview image, from app.stationx.net.

Briefing

The badge is 50 x 30 mm, with a coin-cell holder, a 555-family timer and two LEDs alternating at about 1.5 Hz. The agent, which the article calls HAL, worked through ERC, DRC, an ngspice simulation and Gerber export.

The NE555 cannot run from a 3 V cell; the agent swapped in the pin-compatible TLC555. The first DRC pass found five violations, including the via, which the agent had checked against one pad and not its neighbor. The simulation reported a 150.4% duty cycle; the analytic figure is 52.4%. No source gave the battery holder's polarity. The agent logged its answer as an inference.

House's conclusion is that the design earned trust only once the automated checks had nothing left to flag. He plans to add photos when the boards arrive.

“It was trusted because the tools stopped objecting.”

Nathan House, in the source on app.stationx.net

Tags

Report a problem with this entry