Magic SmokeBB-0116Curator pick

Claude plays robotics: a Go2 walks into a trash can and no model completes the office loop

Anthropic's red team had Claude, GPT, Gemini and other models drive robots, mostly in simulation plus a real Unitree Go2. The team reports that Opus 4.6 misjudged where a trash can was and the Go2 dragged it. Grok 4.1 Fast headed for a table reflected in a glass door, and no model completed an office loop on vision alone.

Open original source anthropic.com · Shmuel Berman, Michael Ilie, Jia Deng and Daniel Freeman (Anthropic)

Claimed
Why this evidence label?

Detailed first-hand account of real Go2 incidents; we found no video of the physical runs.

How we check entries
Preview image for Claude plays robotics: a Go2 walks into a trash can and no model completes the office loop
The source's own preview image, from anthropic.com.

Briefing

Most of the study ran in simulation: control toys, a Unitree G1 humanoid and Go2, and a Franka arm on kitchen tasks. Models mostly failed when setting joint torques directly and did better writing controllers or supervising pretrained policies. A compass aid helped every locomotion setup tested.

On the real Go2, with a crosshair overlay, Opus 4.6 decided a trash can was safely to one side when it was dead ahead. The dog caught a leg and dragged the can a couple of meters before the team stopped it. In a cluttered corridor, a model given a depth heatmap turned toward the obstacles. No model completed a loop of the office hallway on vision alone.

The authors conclude that tools and access belong in any evaluation of a model. The post has no video of the real runs.

“A VLM's real-world influence can change by orders of magnitude depending on the information it has access to.”

Shmuel Berman, Michael Ilie, Jia Deng and Daniel Freeman (Anthropic), in the source on anthropic.com

Tags

Report a problem with this entry